Broadband Delivery UK Industry Day #BDUK

Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) is today holding an “industry day aimed at companies and organisations that have skills, capabilities and assets that they believe could be used to help deliver the government’s Universal Service Commitment and superfast broadband market testing projects”.

The agenda for the day, which is being held within the BIS offices at 1 Victoria Street, London is as follows:

09:30 – 10:00   Registration & Coffee
10:00 – 10:10   Introduction and Welcome – Ed Vaizey
10:10 – 11:00   Setting the context – Jeremy Hunt
11:00 – 12.05   Policy & BDUK update – Adrian Kamellard
12:05 – 12:15   Session roundup and comments – Ed Vaizey
12:15 – 13:15   Lunch
13:15 – 14:15   Industry Exercise – Matt Agar
14:15 – 14:45   Infrastructure Paper – Simon Towler
14:45 – 15:00   Coffee
15:00 – 16:00   Superfast broadband pilots – Adrian Kamellard

This is a hot ticket with far fewer places than people wanting to go. Part of me is a little sceptical of this – I suspect a lot of people will just be there because of the prospect of a trough to stick their snouts in.

Having said that there is clearly a serious purpose to this day as is witnessed by the seniority of the speakers. For UK plc and the broadband impoverished dwellers of the Final Third (BT has considered it only worth investing in NGA for 66% of the populace) it might almost be considered to be a matter of life and death. Certainly life and death of their communities.

Let’s hope that BDUK is successful.

Unfortunately the track record of public organisations in delivering technical projects in this space is not good. Witness my own county of Lincolnshire where around £15m of EU money was scattered liberally on a wireless broadband project only to be blown away by BT when then realised that the whole project was going to be uneconomic beyond the initial subsidy phase. End users were being asked to pay £250 a month (plus VAT) for a symmetrical 2Mbps service! That was £15m down the pan.

I am not sure that any public money should be spent on this type of project and certainly not given to BT which is quite naturally only there to serve the interest of its investors.

We should be concentrating on helping communities in the Final Third to help themselves. Take Ashby de la Launde for example, again in Lincolnshire, where the villagers have reduced the costs of their NGA roll out by digging their own trenches for the fibre conduits. It remains to be seen how successful this project will be – it goes live in September – but it is an example of how to go about it.

If the government can do anything it should be to help make it easier for communities to get NGA up and running for themselves.

Rather than spending moneys up front the government should be providing tax incentives and reducing the rates burden on private investors providing infrastructure to these communities. All after the fact benefits that would help with up front investment decisions.

Jeremy Hunt is today announcing three Market Test Pilots. I sincerely hope that these are driven by third party commercial interests, or by the communities themselves and not simply by dangling money in front of anyone who wants to take it to implement a Public Sector devised plan. I’m sure that we will find out as we work its way through today’s agenda.

A little more information, though not much, is available on the BIS website here.

Published by Trefor Davies

Liver of life, father of four, CTO of trefor.net, writer, poet, philosopherontap.com

Join the Conversation

  1. Trefor Davies

5 Comments

  1. great blog post as ever, and totally agree with you. We have all seen public money wasted on endless reports and consultations, and enough, now is the time to legislate and level the playing field so others can do what the incumbent can’t.
    VOA tax on seed corn needs sorting, and if the incumbent who has a line to every house and business in the uk doesn’t want to use it for NGA then it should be compulsory purchased and given to those that do. Also a big push to community digs would increase jobs…

  2. Couldn’t agree more Trefor

    All too often as we know first hand these sessions take place, lots of talk, lots of posturing and in the end it’s the same old same old and the outcome as we al knew anyway. I resent my hard earned taxes being used in this way to be honest.

    Tax breaks and incentives are certainly a way forward as is the ability for government to listen and act for once on those who actually know what they are talking about.

    Gary

  3. http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/business-sectors/telecommunications/broadband/bduk/industry-day-attendees
    from the list I can see some spongers, but also some movers and shakers, let us hope there are enough good guys there… our guy from ashby there, and also representatives from some other great groups, digital lancaster, rural broadband and others from finalthirdfirst.org. fingers crossed… not everyone on that list of attendees from the looks of it cos I know they are there today.
    chris

  4. Thanks for heads up. Interested in your views on the broadband development funding being offered out through the development agencies even as they wait for closure. Up to £250k to bodies not comms providers unless part of consortia. I can’t see how it’ll be sustainable or even joined-up (whatever ‘it’ turns out to be and how many different ‘its’ that get funded)? Haven’t checked BIS – are the BDUK presentations in the public domain?

  5. mochj
    There is nothing up as yet although Jeremy Hunt’s speech can be read here http://www.culture.gov.uk/news/ministers_speeches/7245.aspx

    As far as how to spend the funding goes I think there has to be a comms provider involved somewhere – just to provide the expertise and the ongoing management. The key is in the ongoing business model. My gut feel is that the monies should go to the consortium/a with the most credible ongoing plan.
    tref

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.