cop this – who is number 72 in the top 100 tech blogs? :)

I realise that this doesn’t mean much but in the interest of enlightenment and world peace I would like to share with you this  fine infographic in which I appear at the magnificent ranking of number 72 in the top 100 tech blogs to follow in 2013:) Fame at last.

Other than using the Alexa rankings I have no idea how they came up with the list but hey, who cares.


Enjoy this article? Please share it with your friends.

share on Facebookshare on LinkedInshare on Twittershare on Google9share on Comments
  1. “Hi, I came across your website and really like the design and thought you have put in to it, bla bla bla. I thought you might like to link to my site as I like yours sooooooo much? Even though I won’t be linking to you.”

    …I might be wrong 😉

  2. Trefor Davies tref

    I’m in charge. I decide:)

  3. The fishing Gardener

    So how does the Alexa ranking work? – other than low looks good!


    1. Trefor Davies tref

      Alexa ranking is a measure of traffic to your site – lower the ranking the more traffic you have.

      check it out here

  4. I don’t know anyone that runs the Alexa toolbar which I believe is how they get their data?!

    When I carry out a report for it reports “no data”.

    I can find data using the same Alexa tool for Timico – so I wonder how your friends at ‘CouponAudit’ managed to find some?

  5. Trefor Davies tref

    HmmUK – that’s probably cos its not I don’t really know its worth or accuracy. Its a bit like all these social media influence scales which are a pile of poo and which are only of any interest to people who think the whole world revolves around social media which it doesn’t.

  6. Trefor Davies tref

    btw I note that the Alexa rank has changed from 512,127 when the infographic was produced to 480,053 now. At this rate world dominance is assured before the end of 2013:) nyahahahahahaaaaaa

  7. .net – good spot *blush*

    For me, when I try a report for I get results for ???
    This shows 480,053 as you posted though – but with the wrong URL?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *