Snoopers Charter Revisited – here we go again
Gets tedious doesn’t it, this constant battle to
introduce defend against the Snooper’s Charter. You will all have seen from the Queen’s Speech (gawd bless ya Ma’am) that the Comms Data Bill (Snooper’s Charter) has been reincarnated into the Investigatory Powers Bill (Snooper’s Charter).
Page 64 is what you are looking for. Details yur if you can’t be bothered to look.
The purpose of this legislation is to:
Provide the police and intelligence agencies with the tools to keep you and your family safe.
Address ongoing capability gaps that are severely degrading the ability of law enforcement and intelligence agencies ability to combat terrorism and other serious crime.
Maintain the ability of our intelligence agencies and law enforcement to target the online communications of terrorists, paedophiles and other serious criminals.
Modernise our law in these areas and ensure it is fit for purpose.
Provide for appropriate oversight and safeguard arrangements.
The main benefits of these clauses would be:
Better equipping law enforcement and intelligence agencies to meet their key operational requirements, and addressing the gap in these agencies’ ability to build intelligence and evidence where subjects of interest, suspects and vulnerable people have communicated online.
Maintain the ability of our intelligence agencies to target the online communications of terrorists, and other relevant capabilities.
Provide for appropriate oversight arrangements and safeguards.
This will respond to issues raised in the independent review by the Independent Reviewer of Counter-Terrorism legislation, which is due to be published shortly.
The main elements of the clauses are:
The legislation covers all investigatory powers including communications data, where the Government has long maintained that the gap in capabilities are putting lives at risk.
The legislation will enable the continuation of the targeting of terrorist communications and other capabilities.
On the face of it none of this text is controversial. The problem lies in the detail. My guess is it is unlikely to have changed materially from its previous incarnation although the bit that says “This will respond to issues raised in the independent review by the Independent Reviewer of Counter-Terrorism legislation” is an attempt to smooth things over.
It’s the snoopers charter revisited. Our problem this time around is that the Lib Dems aren’t around to stop it happening. We may be in for a fight.